At the local community centre there's a charity affair taking place whereby people are making stuff to sell. Trouble is, the material is all quite expensive and the amount they'll get for the goods may not make much money for the recipients. Despite this there's a huge 'out-pouring' of emotion and solidarity from the event organisers who imagine their investment of time to be all-important. When confronted by several individuals about streamlining the affair to raise larger amounts of money they got up on their high horses and tried to lynch the duffers.
It led me to think about the matter and brought me to today's meditation subject:
At what point is pleasing one's own need for feeling good more important than the good deed?
Helping is a normal process, one that we all undertake each day. To be human should preclude helping other people. What then should we expect to feel about our positive actions? Should we slap each other on the back for a job well done? Should we blow our bugles as loud as possible and tell the world what a wonderful deed we have accomplished? Should we wallow in our own satisfaction? The answer to each question is no. Charity, helping and giving should be accompanied by humility and the understanding that our works are free and without attachment or clause.
Let's not forget that helping
does give a satisfaction and a warmth to the helper. This is no bad thing. On the other hand we must avoid becoming a society that lives for such feelings, as they will cloud the judgement of what is best required to help fix particular problems. Charity is giving and helping freely. It should also be about achieving the best outcome for those concerned. The parable of the lady with only very little money giving '
all that she had' remains a fine example of expected behaviour. It's difficult to imagine her going to her neighbours after she left the temple, bragging about the contribution she made. For her there was no need to receive acclaim from others. She carried out the logical plan to an effective conclusion due to her humility.
The subject needs great consideration and as such I can't devote enough time to the process right now. All I want to communicate is the idea that charity is selfless. Attention-seeking is incompatible with selflessness.
The organisers of the charity event will be pissed off if they get wind of my views, especially as the occasional person from the community reads my diary. My best wishes and support goes to all those who are operating beneath the organisers and not getting involved in the self-agrandissement that is blighting the head of this flabby organ.
I must now visit an elderly lady for tea. She has some videos for me to collect, mostly old martial-art films. She's fucking brill.